Why can we not eat an amphibious animal?
Submitted by on Tue, 22/06/2010 - 18:48
Dear Brother / Sister,
Maliki school does not regard any sea animal as an exception whereas Hanbali scholar considers eel (snakefish) a malignant creature and Shafi’i school considers eating amphibious animals’ meat such as frog, crab or crocodile is haram.
According to Hanafi school, eating sea animals that are not in the shape of a fish is considered haram. That means every kind of fish which always live in the water is edible. Turbot, carp, dolphin, eel are among them. However, other sea creatures are not acceptable as hala to eat. Eating mussel, oyster, lobster or crab is not considered as halal but haram.
Based on these principles, sea creatures like mussels or oysters are edible according to Shafi’i, Maliki and Hanbali sects whereas inedible according to Hanafi school. The reason why Hanafi school considers it as haram is that these creatures are unpleasant, ugly and dirty with either in their appearance or with their edible parts.
Questions on Islam
- Is it haram (forbidden) to eat squid (calamari)?
- Is seafood Haram or Halal?
- What are children's rights over their parents?
- is one aloud to have prawn fish
- Could you give information about parents equal treatment to their children and children's rights over their parents?
- Is abrogation present in the Quran? Are there any abrogated (mansukh) verses in the Quran? (mansukh): “something that is (was) made invalid, something that is (was) changed.”
- What are the evidences of our prophet´s (PBUH) prophethood?
- Can't Qur'an be the words of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)? If not, how can it be proven?
- In the Qur’an, could the example of a vessel sailing in the sea be an attribution to the buoyancy force of water?
- What is the wisdom behind feeling pain when we cut or hit ourselves or when we have a headache? Why did God give us this feeling of pain?